Blue Rinsed Straight Fit 13.5oz Cotton Denim Jean - OEM

The Noxon Pant from Carhartt WIP, cut from 13.5 oz Smith denim in a straight fit with a back yoke, a zip fly and a square branded patch on the reverse pocket, listed at 85 GBP in eight waist sizes with seven still in stock. It is the most completely specified garment this run has examined and it also has the worst measurement column this run has examined, and that combination is the whole point. On the one hand it is the first garment in this entire run to publish a fabric weight in a proper unit, the first to publish a model with her height and the size she wears, and it carries a four-part care label including wash inside out. On the other hand its inside leg reads 79, 81, 80, 81, 84, 83, 81 and 82 centimetres across eight sizes, which goes up and down four times, and no amount of rounding can produce that. A length that gets shorter as the garment gets bigger is not a design. So this page is simultaneously the best and the least reliable chart in the run, and the lesson worth drawing is that completeness in one place tells you nothing about reliability in another. The reference is the Noxon Pant in Blue Rinsed. Dongguan Bafinasa Garments Co., Ltd. develops comparable denim on OEM and ODM terms, from cloth sourcing by weight and finish to retail or FBA ready packing. We publish this as a development reference and build your own version of it, and we do not supply the branded original or reproduce anyone else's label.

Key Features

• Inside leg 79, 81, 80, 81, 84, 83, 81 and 82 cm, the run's first non-monotonic column, with four reversals across eight sizes. See the note below
• 13.5 oz Smith denim as stated, the first fabric weight in a proper unit in this entire run. See the note below
• A model published, the first in this run, at 170 cm wearing size 27, though her measurements are not given. See the note below
• Wash inside out at 40, tumble dry on low, iron on low, the most complete care label in the run alongside the T-shirt, with no cycle, no colour transfer warning and no shrinkage figure. See the note below
• About 3.15 in smaller at the waist than the same brand's other jean at the same size label. See the note below
• High waist in the description and regular waist in the bullet list, a direct contradiction, with no rise published. See the note below
• Straight fit as stated, with no thigh, no knee and no leg opening published

Customisable Options

• Cloth: 13.5 oz Smith denim to the reference, with the width, the finish and the shrinkage stated, or a 12 oz denim, or a 14 oz denim, or a denim with stretch, each quoted separately
• Fit: straight to the reference, with the thigh, knee and leg opening published, or a slim straight, or a relaxed straight, or a tapered fit, each quoted separately
• Rise: regular to the reference, with the front and back rise published, or a high rise, or a mid rise, each quoted separately
• Inside leg: graded and verified to the reference, or one length across the range, or offered in short, regular and long, each quoted separately
• Finish: rinsed to the reference, with the shrinkage stated and whether the cloth is sanforized, or a raw denim, or a washed denim, each quoted separately
• Trims: square branded patch label on the reverse pocket to the reference, with the size and position specified, or a woven label, or no label
• Denim weight, width and finish, shrinkage and sanforization, hip, front rise and back rise, thigh, knee and leg opening, verified inside leg per size, zip brand and length, patch size and position, size set, colour development, private label and care labelling

Specifications

Size Chart as Published by the Reference

The waist figures are flat half measures taken with the jean laid down, doubling to 60, 64, 66, 70, 74, 76, 78 and 82 cm around, or 23.62, 25.20, 25.98, 27.56, 29.13, 29.92, 30.71 and 32.28 in. The inseam column is not monotonic: it rises, falls, rises, rises, falls, falls and rises again, so the size 29 is three centimetres longer in the leg than the size 31.

Our Proposed Body Chart

Occasions and Styling

Suits all year round and everyday dressing. A straight dark denim in a sturdy weight is the pair that holds its shape through a long day, and the classic colour works from a weekend to an office.

Production and Quality Control

The reference publishes two columns for all eight sizes, states the fibre and the denim weight in ounces, names the cloth, the fit, the yoke, the closure and the trims, gives a model with her height and the size she wears, gives a four-part care instruction, names the country of production and carries five photographs. It gives no hip, no rise, no thigh, no knee, no leg opening, no shrinkage figure, no pocket dimensions, no zip specification and no size conversion, and publishes no fit guidance beyond one word. Three things follow: the column that goes up and down, the three inches between two jeans with the same label, and the specifications that make this the best page in the run.

Seventy-nine, eighty-one, eighty, eighty-one, eighty-four, eighty-three, eighty-one, eighty-two, and that is the first thing, and it is unlike anything else in this run. Every measurement column this run has examined either rises with size or holds still. This one does neither. It rises by two, falls by one, rises by one, rises by three, falls by one, falls by two and rises by one: four reversals in eight sizes. The consequences are concrete. The size 29 has the longest leg in the range at 84 cm, three centimetres longer than the size 31 and two longer than the size 32. A customer moving up two sizes would lose three centimetres of leg. Now, this run has a well-rehearsed explanation for odd-looking columns, which is that rounding to whole centimetres can disguise an even grade as an uneven one, and it has applied that explanation successfully to a great many columns. It cannot apply it here, and the reason is worth stating because it is a hard limit rather than a judgement. Rounding can move a figure by at most half a centimetre. It cannot reverse the direction of a sequence. A length that gets shorter as the garment gets bigger is not something rounding produces; it is either an error in the cells or genuinely inconsistent manufacture. The test confirms it: no uniform grade comes close, since the first step being plus two requires a grade over about 1.5 and the second step being minus one is impossible for any positive grade. So this column cannot be explained and it cannot be used. There are three readings and it is worth giving all three, because this run does not know which applies and will not pretend to. The first is that some cells are simply wrong, which on an eight-column table is easy to do and easy not to notice. The second is that these are honest measurements of real garments and the cutting genuinely varies by up to five centimetres between sizes, which would be a manufacturing consistency problem rather than a data problem. The third is that the pattern really does hold the inseam independently of size, which is possible but would not produce a monotonic violation this clean. Whichever it is, the column is unusable for choosing a length, and the page gives no warning. It is worth putting this beside the other jean in the batch, because that is what makes it damning rather than merely unfortunate. The Jane Pant, same brand, same season, same country, publishes an inside leg of 80, 80, 80, 81, 81, 81, 81 and 81, which is a clean grade of about two millimetres per size. So the brand produces a clean inseam column on one jean and a non-monotonic one on the other, in the same batch. And the Noxon is the jean that is better specified everywhere else. That is the lesson of this garment: completeness in one place tells you nothing about reliability in another, and a page that gives you the weight of the denim to one decimal place can still hand you a length column that goes backwards.

A size twenty-seven that measures twenty-six, and a size twenty-seven that measures twenty-nine, and that is the second thing. Both jeans in this batch are labelled in waist inches from 25 to 32, and both publish their measured waist, so they can be compared directly, and the comparison is startling. At size 27, this jean measures 66 cm around, or 25.98 in. The Jane measures 74 cm around, or 29.13 in. The same brand, the same season, the same nominal size, and 8 cm or 3.15 inches apart. It is worth tracing the whole range rather than one size, because the gap is not even. At size 25 the two are 2.4 in apart and at size 32 they are 0.8 in apart, so the divergence is widest in the middle of the range where most customers are. And it is worth asking which of the two is conventionally right, because a jean labelled 27 ought to measure somewhere around 27 to 28 inches around. This one measures 26.0, which is about an inch smaller than its own label, and the Jane measures 29.1, which is about two inches larger. So this jean runs small against its label and the other runs large, and neither is at the nominal. In isolation that is a numbering convention and every denim brand is inconsistent about it. The problem is that both numbers are on the same brand's own size labels in the same season, so a customer cannot carry her size from one style to the other. And on this jean the consequence is sharper than usual, because the cloth is 100% cotton with no elastane. A woman with a 27 inch waist who buys a 27 is getting a waistband an inch smaller than she is, in rigid denim that will not give. She needs to size up, and nothing on the page says so. It is worth noting what the page does offer instead, because it is genuinely the best attempt in this run. It publishes a model: 170 cm tall and wears size 27. That is the first model information of any kind in this entire run and it deserves credit. But it is the less useful half of what a customer needs. Her height tells you about length, and the number that would let a customer place herself on a waist chart is her waist, which is not given. So a reader learns that a woman of average height takes a 27, and still cannot tell whether she is a 27. It is worth adding the usual omissions here, because they are the same ones and they matter more on rigid denim: no hip, and no rise, and therefore no way to know whether this jean will go on or where it will sit. And the page contradicts itself about the rise while it is at it: the description says high waist, the bullet list says regular waist, and no measurement settles it.

Thirteen point five ounces, and a model, and wash inside out, and that is the third thing, and it is where this garment earns its praise. This is the first garment in this entire run to publish a fabric weight in a proper unit. The run has examined cashmere, alpaca, corduroy, poplin and jersey and not one of them gave a weight, and it has complained about that on nearly every one. Here is a denim at 13.5 oz, stated on the cloth and repeated in the bullet list, and 13.5 is genuinely heavyweight, so the word sturdy in the description is earned rather than asserted. It is worth saying what that single number buys, because it is a good argument for the practice. Denim weight decides the drape, how the cloth breaks in, how warm it is, how long it lasts and what it costs, and a customer who knows she likes a 13.5 oz jean can find another one. She cannot do that with the word heavyweight. The name Smith is given for the cloth as well, which is a quality reference and worth a smaller credit. Then the care label, which is the most complete in this run alongside the T-shirt published in the same batch: wash inside out at forty, tumble dry on low heat, iron on low heat. Wash inside out is the only instance in this run of an instruction that protects a dark indigo from fading, and it is on the garment where it matters most, and the brand's other jean in this batch does not have it. Tumble dry and iron are both given with a heat setting, which is more than any other page in this run manages. What is still missing is worth listing because it shows that even the best label in the run is incomplete. No wash cycle is named, which is a gap on a heavy cotton but a minor one. Nothing about colour transfer, and dark indigo crocks onto light surfaces and onto other garments in the wash, and a first wash can ruin what is in the machine with it. And no shrinkage figure, and no statement of whether the cloth is sanforized, which on a rigid denim told to wash at forty and tumble dry is the number that decides whether it still fits after the first wash. The colour name says rinsed, which implies one wash at the mill, but the term is never explained and no figure is given. It is worth ending on a small thing that is not small. The description contains a misspelling, perenial for perennial, on a live product page, and the T-shirt published in the same batch repeats a bullet. Two visible editorial defects on two of three pages in one batch. A duplicated bullet and a misspelt word are trivial in themselves. They matter here because they are the visible sign of a page that was not read back before it went live, and the Noxon has a measurement column that also appears not to have been read back. The two failures have the same cause, and a maker who checks one will usually check the other. Every bulk shipment gets a measurement report against your approved chart.

Optional upgrades include verifying and republishing the inseam per size, publishing the hip, the front rise and the back rise, the thigh, the knee and the leg opening, stating the denim width, the finish and the shrinkage and whether the cloth is sanforized, offering short, regular and long leg lengths, giving the model's waist and hip alongside her height, adding a wash cycle, a colour transfer warning and a shrinkage figure to the care label, resolving the contradiction between high waist and regular waist with a published rise, giving the zip brand and length and the patch size and position, giving the yoke depth, a 12 oz and a 14 oz denim and a denim with stretch, slim straight, relaxed straight and tapered fit options, raw and washed finishes, size set, colour development, private label, hangtag and care labelling.

Pre-production sample approval, in-line inspection during cutting and sewing, and a final AQL inspection before packing, with measurement reports and photos shared before shipment.

Send us your tech pack, a photo or a reference garment and we will quote within 24 hours. Contact bafinasa@bafinasa.com or WhatsApp +86 13827222469.