Batwing Sleeve Mackintosh Style Short Jacket - OEM

The Jodie Jacket from Bellerose in dark navy and grey, a take on the classic Mackintosh with brushed cotton twill lining, balloon style batwing sleeves, a seamless front button placket, side seam pockets and pleats at the back, listed at 255 GBP with three of four sizes in stock. It is worth beginning with the most detailed specification this run has read from this brand, because there are two disclosures here that almost nobody makes and both deserve credit. The composition is given in three separate panels: the shell at 72% cotton and 28% polyamide, the body lining at 100% cotton, and the sleeve lining at 96% polyester and 4% elastane. Three panels, all to the percentage, which is exactly what a lined garment should look like and which this run has been asking for since it started reading care labels. And one bullet reads, in parentheses, that there is one visible button at the collar. That is a button count. This run has noted the absence of a button count on a great many garments and this is the first page in the run to volunteer one. The second thing worth setting out is the chart, because it has the opposite fault to another garment from this brand in this same batch. That one offers five sizes and publishes four columns, so a size you can buy has no measurements. This one offers four sizes, XS to L, and publishes five columns, running through to XL. So it publishes measurements for a size that cannot be bought. The reference is the Jodie Jacket. Dongguan Bafinasa Garments Co., Ltd. develops comparable outerwear on OEM and ODM terms, from shell and lining sourcing to retail or FBA ready packing. We publish this as a development reference and build your own version of it, and we do not supply the branded original or reproduce anyone else's label.

Key Features

• Five columns published for four sizes, including an XL that cannot be bought. See the note below
• Three composition panels, shell, body lining and sleeve lining, all to the percentage. See the note below
• A button count, in parentheses, which is the first this run has been given. See the note below
• Fits true to size as stated, and the ease is consistent at about 19 in, which is not what true to size sounds like. See the note below
• Relatively waterproof and named for a Mackintosh, on a 72% cotton shell with no coating and no rating. See the note below
• Shorter length, falls just below the waist as stated, at 65 to 72 cm. See the note below
• Batwing sleeves measured at 40 to 44 cm, on a construction with no armhole seam. See the note below

Customisable Options

• Shell: a cotton and polyamide blend to the reference at 72 and 28, with the weight in grams per square metre stated, or a coated cotton, or a cotton rich twill, or a recycled polyamide blend, or a waxed cotton, each quoted separately
• Weather: the lightweight shell to the reference, with the spray test rating and the hydrostatic head stated, or a waterproof membrane, or taped seams, or a water repellent finish with the rating tested, each quoted separately
• Sleeve: balloon batwing sleeves to the reference, with the sleeve measurement origin and the opening stated, or a set in sleeve, or a raglan sleeve, or a dolman sleeve, each quoted separately
• Lining: a brushed cotton twill body lining and a silky sleeve lining to the reference, with the weights stated, or a single lining throughout, or a quilted lining, or an unlined body, each quoted separately
• Back: pleated detailing at the back to the reference, with the pleat count and depth stated, or a plain back, or a vented back, or a yoke with pleats, each quoted separately
• Length: a shorter length falling just below the waist to the reference, with the length stated and a model height given, or a hip length, or a longer length, each quoted separately
• Shell weight, lining weights, spray test rating and hydrostatic head, taped seam option, sleeve measurement origin and opening, pleat count and depth, pocket dimensions, placket button count and size, shoulder drop, check or weave repeat, shrinkage and colourfastness figures, size set, colour development, private label and care labelling

Specifications

Size Chart as Published by the Reference

The pit to pit figures are flat half measures taken with the jacket laid down, doubling to 132, 136, 140 and 148 cm around, or 51.97, 53.54, 55.12, 56.69 and 58.27 in. The bust steps exactly 2 cm at every step. The sleeve runs 40, 40, 42, 44 and 44 cm, stepping 0, 2, 2 and 0, and the total length runs 65, 66, 68, 70 and 72 cm, stepping 1, 2, 2 and 2. The reference publishes five columns on a garment offered in four sizes, XS to L, so the XL column describes a size that cannot be bought. No size conversion is published.

Our Proposed Body Chart

Occasions and Styling

Suits autumn, spring and light rain. A short jacket with batwing sleeves and back pleats layers over knitwear without bulk, and the shorter length works over a dress or a high waisted trouser.

Production and Quality Control

The reference declares three composition panels separately and all to the percentage, names the weave and finish of the body lining, volunteers a button count, grades its bust cleanly, gives a length description rather than only a length word, gives a care instruction with five clauses including a bleach prohibition and an alternative to washing, states the fit word and lists nine bullets naming real features, and names the style and colour codes. It gives no cloth weight, no lining weights, no spray test rating, no coating, no seam construction, no sleeve measurement origin or opening, no pleat count or depth, no pocket dimensions, no shoulder drop, no shrinkage figure, no colourfastness figure, no size conversion and no model, it publishes five columns for four sizes, and its sleeve and length columns both step irregularly. Three things follow: the chart that covers a size you cannot buy, the true to size claim that the chart partly supports and partly contradicts, and the waterproof heritage claimed on a shell that is mostly cotton.

Five columns, four sizes, and that is the first thing, and it is the mirror image of a fault this run found on another garment from this brand in this same batch. That garment is a shirt, offered in five sizes from XS to XL, and its chart has four columns, so the largest size it sells has no measurements and can still be bought. This jacket is offered in four sizes, XS to L, and its chart has five columns, running through to an XL that is not sold. So one garment publishes too few columns and the other too many, on the same brand, in the same season, in the same week. It is worth saying what this establishes, because neither error alone would establish it. One mismatch could be a slip. Two, in opposite directions, in one batch, says something about how these tables are made: the chart and the size list are produced separately and not read against each other. And it is worth noting the consequence, which is small but real. A customer who is between sizes, or who wants to know whether she is at the top of this jacket's range, is reading a column for a garment she cannot order, and the column above it is the last one that exists. It is worth adding what the columns themselves do, because the bust is clean and the other two are not. The bust goes 66, 68, 70, 72 and 74, stepping two at every step, perfectly regular. The sleeve goes 40, 40, 42, 44 and 44, stepping nothing, then two, then two, then nothing. The length goes 65, 66, 68, 70 and 72, stepping one, then two, then two, then two. So the first step of the length is half of every step after it, and the sleeve repeats at both ends. This run has learned, earlier in this batch, that a column which alternates rather than wobbles can be a sub centimetre grade showing through rounding, and that is worth testing here. It does not work: a grade of one centimetre would give 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, and that is not this column. So these two are irregular rather than merely rounded, and the garment that gives the cleanest bust grade of the three from this brand also gives two irregular columns beside it.

True to size, and that is the second thing, and this run has been waiting for a garment where the claim can actually be tested. The bullets say fits true to size, and the chart is complete enough to check it, and there is a size conversion nowhere on the page but letter sizes are at least self describing. The bust runs 66 to 74 centimetres flat, which doubles to 132 to 148 centimetres around, or about 52 to 58 inches. Set that against bodies of roughly 32 to 38 inches across XS to L, and the ease comes out at about twenty inches at the smallest size and about nineteen at the largest. It is worth saying what that means, because it is two separate results and they point different ways. First, the claim partly holds. The ease is nearly constant: it falls by a little over an inch across the whole range, where this run has measured garments from other brands whose ease moves by five inches or more from end to end. So the sizing is consistent, and a customer who takes her usual size will get the same relationship to the garment at every size. That is worth crediting, and it is the first time in this run that a true to size claim has survived the arithmetic in this direction. Second, and this is the part that does not hold, twenty inches of ease is not what true to size sounds like. It is a voluminous jacket, cut with batwing sleeves and back pleats, and it is meant to be. But a customer reading fits true to size on a website is entitled to read it as this will fit me as my size usually does, and on this garment that means twenty inches of room. It is worth setting this beside the two other true to size garments this run has tested, because the three together are the finding. One was a pair of jeans whose ease ran from about three and a half inches down to about two, and another from the same brand whose ease ran from under one inch up to six. This one holds steady at about twenty. Same three words, three completely different meanings: getting tighter, getting looser, and consistently enormous. It is worth closing on the length word, because this page gives more than most and it is still not quite enough. One bullet reads shorter length, and then in parentheses, falls just below the waist. That is the most specific length description this run has been given. But the chart says 65 to 72 centimetres, and on an average woman the waist sits roughly 40 to 45 centimetres below the shoulder point, so 65 to 72 is somewhere between 20 and 30 centimetres past the waist, which is mid hip rather than just below it. Shorter is a relative word and it is probably true against a full length Mackintosh. The absolute claim in the parentheses is the one that does not sit comfortably with the number, and there is no model to settle it.

Seventy two, and that is the third thing, and it is worth starting with the credit because the specification is genuinely the best this run has read from this brand. The composition is given in three panels: the shell at 72% cotton and 28% polyamide, the body lining at 100% cotton, and the sleeve lining at 96% polyester and 4% elastane. Three panels, separately, all to the percentage. This run has complained on lined garments that a single blended figure hides what a customer is actually wearing, and this page separates them properly. The body lining is further described as brushed cotton twill, which names the weave and the finish, and the sleeve lining carries its elastane, so the stretch in the sleeve is accounted for in the panel rather than left for the customer to wonder about. And one bullet says, in parentheses, that there is one visible button at the collar, on a seamless placket. That is a button count. This run has noted the absence of a button count on a great many garments, on shirts and cardigans and coats, and this is the first page in the run to volunteer one. All of that is credit, and it is worth saying that it costs nothing: it is a sentence. Now the claim, and here the specification does not support it. The description says the jacket is ideal for when you need a light, relatively waterproof layer, and that it is a delightful take on the classic Mackintosh. A Mackintosh is a waterproof garment, named after the rubberised cloth it was made from, and it is a specific claim to invoke. The shell is 72% cotton, and cotton absorbs water rather than shedding it. There is no coating named, no membrane named, no finish named, no spray test rating, no hydrostatic head, and no mention of seam construction, and needle holes are where a shell lets water in first. Relatively waterproof is a hedged phrase, and the hedge is honest in the sense that it concedes the garment may not keep you dry, but a hedge is not a measurement, and it is not falsifiable: there is no amount of rain that would prove it wrong. It is worth setting this beside another garment from this brand in this same batch, which has a 100% polyamide shell, calls itself water repellent, and also gives no rating. So this brand makes claims about water on two garments in one batch, with two different words, no figure on either, and no way to compare them. It is worth closing on the sleeve, because it has the same problem this run found on another garment in this batch and states it even more plainly. The sleeves are balloon style batwing sleeves, measured at 40 to 44 centimetres. A batwing sleeve is cut as part of the body and has no armhole seam, so there is no shoulder point to measure from in the usual way. The number is real, and the origin is not stated, and on this construction the usual origin does not exist. Every bulk shipment gets a measurement report against your approved chart.

Optional upgrades include aligning the chart with the sizes offered, testing and publishing a spray test rating and a hydrostatic head, offering taped or welded seams, quoting the shell and both lining weights in grams per square metre, stating the sleeve measurement origin and opening, giving the pleat count and depth, the pocket dimensions and the placket button count and size, adding washing inside out, washing with like colours and shrinkage and colourfastness figures to the label, publishing a size conversion and a model height, coated and waxed cotton and recycled polyamide blends, waterproof membranes and water repellent finishes with the rating tested, set in, raglan and dolman sleeves, plain, vented and yoked backs, hip and longer lengths, single, quilted and unlined bodies, size set, colour development, private label, hangtag and care labelling.

Pre-production sample approval, in-line inspection during cutting and sewing, and a final AQL inspection before packing, with measurement reports and photos shared before shipment.

Send us your tech pack, a photo or a reference garment and we will quote within 24 hours. Contact bafinasa@bafinasa.com or WhatsApp +86 13827222469.