Seamless Heavyweight Cotton Crew Neck Tee - OEM

The Heavy Duty Crew Neck T-Shirt in Grey from Allevol, built from 100% US cotton with yarns spun in Japan and knitted on vintage circular machines so that the torso has no side seams, finished with a bound collar and triple stitching in a short boxy mid-century silhouette, listed at 65 GBP and in stock in all five sizes. It is worth beginning with the chart, because it is the least tidy the run has met. It is worth then stating the chest run, which is 18.3, 20.3, 21.5, 23.3 and 23.8 inches. It is worth then stating the steps, which are two inches, then one point two, then one point eight, then half an inch. It is worth then stating what the run has never seen, which is one row varying fourfold. It is worth then stating what that means in a fitting room, which is that the jump from small to medium gives you two inches of chest and the jump from extra large to extra extra large gives you half an inch. It is worth then stating what the run should now do, which is stop saying the grade is irregular and start saying that the largest buyer gets an inch less ease than the one below them. It is worth then stating the second thing, which is that this garment is the run's first case where neither the inch reading nor the centimetre reading is clean, and it is worth then stating why that matters, which is that the run built a detector last batch and it should show where the detector stops. It is worth then stating the last thing, which is a pair of predictions already queued: the navy colourway should carry the code 500 CTN NVY and should carry this same chart. The reference is the Heavy Duty Crew Neck T-Shirt. Dongguan Bafinasa Garments Co., Ltd. develops comparable jersey on OEM and ODM terms, from fabric and trim development to retail or FBA ready packing. We publish this as a development reference and build your own version of it, and we do not supply the branded original or reproduce anyone else's label.

Key Features

• One chest row that varies fourfold: two inches at the bottom and half an inch at the top. See the note below
• The ease rises and then comes back down, which is what a collapse at the top does to a body. See the note below
• The formula holds on all four steps including the negative one, the hardest test it has had
• A yarn count at last: 14 count, and the house calls it thick, and the two agree. See the note below
• Fibre origin given - US cotton - and it is not the country the garment was made in. See the note below
• Seamless, and knitted on a named machine, and the run now has two of these. See the note below
• Care text identical word for word to another house's, and both are made in Japan. See the note below
• The first case where neither the inch nor the centimetre reading is clean. See the note below

Customisable Options

• Fabric: a heavyweight US cotton jersey to the reference with the weight in grams per square metre stated, or a heavyweight jersey from another fibre origin with the origin stated, or a lighter jersey at a published weight, each quoted separately
• Knit: seamless circular knit to the reference with the machine type named, or a side seamed jersey with the reason for the choice stated, each quoted separately. See the note below
• Grade: a stated grade per row, and a grade that does not collapse at the largest size. See the note below
• Chart: five columns matched to five sizes in both directions, with the grade stated and the ease shown to the buyer. See the note below
• Collar: a bound collar to the reference with the neck width and rib depth published, or a rib collar, each quoted separately
• Care: a washing temperature as a number with a second cleaning method named, and an ironing temperature as a number
• Composition with every share stated and summing to one hundred and published as its own field, the fibre origin stated separately from the country of manufacture, the fabric weight in grams per square metre, the yarn count, chest with the flat or round method stated, sleeve length with the sleeve type in the row label, the back length with the measurement point stated, shoulder width, the neck width and rib depth, a stated grade per row with the ease shown to the buyer for every size, the knitting method and machine type, the stitch type and count for any durability claim, an order of preference for cleaning with the washing temperature as a number and a second cleaning method named, an ironing temperature as a number, drying and storage guidance, shrinkage figures for both length and width, a pilling grade tested after a stated number of cycles, colour fastness to washing, rubbing, light and perspiration, any durability claim tested rather than asserted, a stock line for every size, size set, colour development, private label and care labelling

Specifications

Size Chart as Published by the Reference

The chest figures are flat half measures, doubling to 36.6, 40.6, 43, 46.6 and 47.6 in around. Against men's bodies of roughly 37 to 45 in at the chest, the ease is minus 0.4, plus 1.6, plus 2, plus 3.6 and plus 2.6 in. Note the shape of that: it rises and then falls, which the run has never seen, and note what causes it, which is the last grade collapsing to half an inch. Note what that means for the largest buyer, which is that the XXL gives about an inch less ease than the XL relative to their bodies, and note that this is the form the run should write its criticisms in from now on. Note the formula, which gives plus 2, plus 0.4, plus 1.6 and minus 1 for these four steps, and note that all four match, including the negative one, which is the hardest test it has had. Note the sleeve, where sizes S and M share 7.5 in, and note the length, which jumps one and a half inches from M to L. Note the ratio, which is 0.73, and note what the run should say about its own ratio metric after this garment, which is that it may be measuring the wrong thing. Our proposal below publishes the fabric weight, the measurement points, a stated grade per row, the ease shown to the buyer, the shoulder width, and the neck width and rib depth.

Our Proposed Body Chart

Occasions and Styling

Suits everyday wear, work, weekends, layering and spring and summer. A seamless heavyweight tee has no side seam to twist, and a short boxy body sits over a trouser without tucking.

Production and Quality Control

The reference publishes three measurements for all five sizes, states one fibre with a share, gives the fibre's country of origin, gives a yarn count, names the spinning country, the knitting machine and the construction, gives a bound collar with its stitch type, gives triple stitching, describes its silhouette, gives four care instructions including a washing temperature as a number, names its country, carries eight bullets and three photographs, and gives a style number. It gives no fabric weight as a number although it says heavy and heavyweight, no shoulder width, no waist, no sleeve measurement point, no length measurement point, no neck width, no rib depth, no measurement of the boxy silhouette it claims, no stitch count, no seams named for the triple stitching, no second cleaning method, no ironing temperature as a number, no storage guidance, no model, no size conversion, no shrinkage figure, no pilling grade and no colour fastness figure, no statement of whether any figure is flat or round, no test behind either durability claim, and no explanation of why it asks the buyer to wash inside out. Three things follow: the run should restate every grade criticism in the buyer's terms; the ratio metric may be under specified; and the run can now name a garment type it has two members of.

Two, then one point two, then one point eight, then half an inch, and that is the first thing, and it is worth saying what the run has been writing. It is worth then stating what it has been writing, which is that a grade is irregular, and it is worth then stating what that means to nobody in particular. It is worth then stating what it should write instead, which is this: going from small to medium buys you two inches of chest, and going from extra large to extra extra large buys you half an inch. It is worth then stating what the run computed to check that, which is the ease, and it is worth then stating what the ease does, which is rise to three point six and then fall to two point six. It is worth then stating what that is, which is the largest size wearing an inch tighter than the one below it, relative to their bodies, and it is worth then stating that this is the first time in the run the ease has gone up and then come back down. It is worth then stating what the run should now do, which is go back and restate every broken grade it has criticised in these terms, because this is the form a buyer can act on. It is worth then stating the second thing, which is the harder one. It is worth then stating that the run built a centimetre detector last batch and it fired on two Wax garments, and it is worth then stating what it does here, which is nothing. It is worth then stating why: in centimetres these steps are about five, three, four point five and one point two five, and that is not a grade rule either. It is worth then stating what the run should conclude, which is that this is its first garment where neither reading is clean, and it is worth then stating why it should say so, which is that it has just built an instrument and it should show where the instrument stops. It is worth then stating the count so far, which is one clean positive and three negatives.

Fourteen, and that is the second thing, and it is worth saying what the run asked for last batch. It is worth then stating what it asked for, which is a yarn count, and it is worth then stating why, which is so that the Sunray's softness claim could be checked. It is worth then stating what the run has now, which is one house that makes a softness claim and gives no count, and another that gives a count and makes no claim. It is worth then stating what that means, which is that neither can be checked, and it is worth then stating that this is the state of it and the run should not pretend otherwise. It is worth then stating what it can check here, which is the count itself: fourteen is coarse on the cotton count system, where a higher number is a finer yarn, and the house calls it thick, and those agree. It is worth then stating that this is the first yarn claim the run has been able to check, and it is worth then stating that one case is one case. It is worth then stating the third thing, which is the care. It is worth then stating what it is, which is machine wash thirty, wash inside out, do not tumble dry, iron low, and it is worth then stating that this is identical, word for word, to the Sunray's care from last batch. It is worth then stating what the run concluded last batch, which is that care travels with the supplier, and it is worth then stating what this does to that, which is complicate it, because these are two different houses. It is worth then stating the two candidates, which are a shared care label template and a shared country, and it is worth then stating why the run cannot choose, which is that both houses are Japanese and the two explanations are confounded. It is worth then stating what would settle it: a third unrelated Japanese house with the same text points to the country, and a non Japanese house with the same text points to a template.

Optional upgrades include the fabric weight in grams per square metre, the shoulder width and waist, the sleeve measurement point, the length measurement point, the neck width and rib depth, a measurement of the boxy silhouette, the stitch count and the seams named for the triple stitching, a stated grade per row that does not collapse at the largest size, the ease shown to the buyer for every size, a second cleaning method, an ironing temperature as a number, storage guidance, an explanation of why the garment should be washed inside out, shrinkage figures for both length and width, a pilling grade tested after a stated number of cycles, colour fastness to washing, rubbing, light and perspiration, both durability claims tested with the cycle count published, further colourways, long sleeve and pocket options, size set, private label and care labelling.

Pre-production sample approval, in-line inspection during cutting and sewing, and a final AQL inspection before packing, with measurement reports and photos shared before shipment.

Send us your tech pack, a photo or a reference garment and we will quote within 24 hours. Contact bafinasa@bafinasa.com or WhatsApp +86 13827222469.