Loopwheel Knitted 260gsm Cotton Tee - OEM

The Haleiwa SS Tee in Off White from Sunray Sportswear, loopwheel knitted in Japan on an antique machine from a heavyweight 260gsm cotton jersey made with recycled cotton from cotton combing, with no side seam and no external branding, listed at 72 GBP and in stock in two sizes of five. It is worth beginning with the number, because the run has been asking for a fabric weight as a number on every garment and has almost never had one. It is worth then stating what this one gives, which is 260 grams per square metre, and it is worth then stating where it appears, which is twice, in the prose and in the bullets, and it is worth then stating whether they agree, which is that they do. It is worth then stating what the run can now do that it could not before, which is convert: 260 grams per square metre is about 7.7 ounces. It is worth then stating the other number it has, which is 6.8 ounces on a down jacket the run called lightweight, and it is worth then stating what this garment is called, which is heavyweight. It is worth then stating what the run has been saying for a hundred garments, which is that the weight words are relative and cannot be checked. It is worth then stating what it should now say, which is that it was wrong: they are checkable whenever a number is given, and the two numbers it has agree with the two words. It is worth then stating what follows, which is that the run should ask for the number so that the word can be checked, and not ask for the word. It is worth then stating the second thing, which is the ease, and it is worth stating what it is, which is plus three inches at every one of five sizes, and it is worth then stating what the run has never had before, which is a garment that does not drift. The reference is the Haleiwa SS Tee. Dongguan Bafinasa Garments Co., Ltd. develops comparable jersey on OEM and ODM terms, from fabric and trim development to retail or FBA ready packing. We publish this as a development reference and build your own version of it, and we do not supply the branded original or reproduce anyone else's label.

Key Features

• 260gsm, a fabric weight as a number, twice, and it agrees. See the note below
• The weight words are checkable after all, and the run was wrong to call them uncheckable. See the note below
• Ease constant at plus three across five sizes: the run's first garment that does not drift. See the note below
• Two zero steps in one row, and the coarse grid excuse fails twice on the same row. See the note below
• A width-to-length ratio of 0.77 against 0.64 on a tee also called regular fit. See the note below
• No side seam, which follows from the loopwheel, and which fixes the waist to the chest. See the note below
• Machine wash 30: the second washing temperature as a number in this batch. See the note below
• Image stamps spanning 2021 to 2023, which ends the run's timestamp instrument. See the note below

Customisable Options

• Fabric: a loopwheel knitted 260gsm cotton jersey to the reference with the knitting method named, or a conventional tubular knit at the same weight, or a side-seamed jersey at the same weight with the reason for the choice stated, each quoted separately. See the note below
• Weight: the fabric weight published in grams per square metre so that any weight word used can be checked against it. See the note below
• Shape: the width-to-length ratio published, so that regular fit means something measurable. See the note below
• Grade: a stated grade per row, so that a tapered grade is a choice on the record. See the note below
• Recycled content: the percentage stated with the certifier and licence number, and whether the waste is pre-consumer or post-consumer. See the note below
• Care: a washing temperature as a number with a second cleaning method named, and an ironing temperature as a number
• Composition with every share stated and summing to one hundred and published as its own field, the fabric weight in grams per square metre, the yarn count, the knitting method, chest with the flat or round method stated, sleeve length with the sleeve type in the row label, the back length with the measurement point stated, shoulder width, the neck width and rib depth, the width-to-length ratio, a stated grade per row, a size conversion that says whether it maps to a body measurement or to a garment measurement, the recycled percentage with its certifier and whether the waste is pre-consumer or post-consumer, an order of preference for cleaning with the washing temperature as a number and a second cleaning method named, an ironing temperature as a number, drying and storage guidance, shrinkage figures for both length and width, a pilling grade tested after a stated number of cycles, colour fastness to washing, rubbing, light and perspiration, a durability claim tested rather than asserted, a stock line for every size, size set, colour development, private label and care labelling

Specifications

Size Chart as Published by the Reference

The chest figures are flat half measures, doubling to 40, 42, 44, 46 and 48 in around. Against men's bodies of roughly 37 to 45 in at the chest, the ease is plus 3 in at every size and does not drift at all. Note what that is, which is the run's first garment with a constant ease, and note what it gives the run, which is a picture of what correct grading looks like: the garment grades two inches around and the body grades two, so the ease holds. Note that every other garment in this run has drifted, and note that the run has therefore only ever described broken grading and never described correct grading, and it can now do both. Note the sleeve, which is 8, 8.5, 9, 9 and 9, so two zero steps at the top, and note that this row carries a half inch, so the grid is fine and the coarse grid excuse fails twice on one row. Note the shape: the steps are non-increasing, so the run's test sorts this row as a taper, and a taper on a sleeve is harmless where a taper on a chest changes the fit. Note the length, which rises then falls, so the test sorts that one as an irregularity and not a taper. Note the shape ratio, which is 20 over 26, or 0.77, against 0.64 on a tee that is also called regular fit, and note what two garments with the same fit word and opposite shapes do to the fit word. Our proposal below publishes the fabric weight, the yarn count, the measurement points, a stated grade per row, the ratio, and the recycled percentage with its certifier.

Our Proposed Body Chart

Occasions and Styling

Suits everyday wear, weekends, layering and spring and summer. A heavyweight 260gsm jersey holds its shape and works on its own, and a tee with no external branding sits under anything.

Production and Quality Control

The reference publishes three measurements for all five sizes, gives a size conversion, states one fibre with a share and states it in two places, gives a fabric weight as a number and gives it twice and consistently, names its knitting method and its machine, states a construction consequence, makes a recycled claim, gives four care instructions including a washing temperature as a number, names its country, carries six bullets and several photographs, and says it carries no external branding. It gives no yarn count although it makes a softness claim from one, no percentage and no certifier for the recycled claim and does not say whether the waste is pre-consumer or post-consumer, no certification, no shoulder width, no waist, no sleeve measurement point, no length measurement point, no neck width, no rib depth, no second cleaning method, no ironing temperature as a number, no storage guidance, no model, no shrinkage figure, no pilling grade and no colour fastness figure, no statement of whether any figure is flat or round, no test behind either of its two durability claims, no style code, and no explanation of why it asks the buyer to wash inside out. Three things follow: the weight words are checkable and the run was wrong; this garment is the run's first picture of correct grading; and the run's timestamp instrument is dead.

Two hundred and sixty, and that is the first thing, and it is worth saying what the run has been claiming. It is worth then stating what it has been claiming, which is that the weight words - lightweight, midweight, heavyweight - are relative to the house or to the garment type and cannot be checked. It is worth then stating what this garment gives, which is 260 grams per square metre, and it is worth then stating what the run can do with it, which is convert: 260 grams per square metre is about 7.7 ounces. It is worth then stating the run's only other number, which is 6.8 ounces on a down jacket called lightweight, and it is worth then stating what this one is called, which is heavyweight. It is worth then stating whether the numbers agree with the words, which is that they do. It is worth then stating what the run must now say, which is that it was wrong: the words are checkable whenever a number is given. It is worth then stating what it should ask for instead of the word, which is the number, so that the word can be checked. It is worth then stating the caveat, which is that two numbers is not enough to fix the thresholds, and it is worth then stating what the run should do, which is record every weight number it meets from now on and see where the words fall. It is worth then stating the second thing, which is better. It is worth then stating the ease, which is plus three at all five sizes, and it is worth then stating what the run has never had, which is a garment that does not drift. It is worth then stating what that gives it, which is a positive example: for a hundred garments it has only ever been able to say what broken grading looks like, and now it can say what correct grading looks like, which is a constant ease. It is worth then stating the third thing, which is the fit word. It is worth then stating what this garment is called, which is regular fit, and it is worth then stating its shape ratio, which is 0.77, and it is worth then stating what the other tee in this batch is called, which is also regular fit, and it is worth then stating its ratio, which is 0.64. It is worth then stating what two garments with one fit word and two opposite shapes mean, which is that the word carries no information, and it is worth then stating what the run should ask for instead, which is the ratio.

Two, and that is the second thing, and it is worth saying what they are. It is worth then stating the sleeve, which is 8, 8.5, 9, 9 and 9, and it is worth then stating the zero steps, which are at the top and adjacent, and it is worth then stating that these are the fifth and sixth in the run. It is worth then stating the coarse grid excuse, which is that a small grade rounds to zero on a coarse grid, and it is worth then stating how it fares here, which is that it fails twice on one row, because the row carries a half inch and so the grid is plainly fine. It is worth then stating the run's test from last batch, which is whether the steps are non-increasing, and it is worth then stating what this row is, which is non-increasing, so the test sorts it as a taper. It is worth then stating what the length is, which is 26, 26.5, 27.5, 28 and 28, and it is worth then stating its steps, which rise then fall, so the test sorts that one as an irregularity and not a taper. It is worth then stating what the run now has, which is two named groups and a test that sorts them, and it is worth then stating that this is what it asked for last batch instead of five names. It is worth then stating what it should do next, which is run the test over every broken row it has recorded, as a piece of work and not as a remark. It is worth then stating the third thing, which is the photographs. It is worth then stating the stamps, which run from 2021 to 2023, and it is worth then stating the span, which is about 611 days. It is worth then stating what the run has been doing, which is treating an image upload stamp as a proxy for when a listing was written, and it is worth then stating what this proves, which is that the stamp measures when a photograph was taken and nothing else. It is worth then stating what the run should now say, which is that the instrument is dead and not merely weakened, and it is worth then stating what it should do with every gap it has computed, which is withdraw them.

Optional upgrades include the yarn count, the shoulder width and waist, the sleeve measurement point, the length measurement point, the neck width and rib depth, the width-to-length ratio published as a shape field, a stated grade per row, a second cleaning method, an ironing temperature as a number, storage guidance, an explanation of why the garment should be washed inside out, shrinkage figures for both length and width, a pilling grade tested after a stated number of cycles, colour fastness to washing, rubbing, light and perspiration, both durability claims tested and the cycle count published, the recycled percentage with its certifier and whether the waste is pre-consumer or post-consumer, a style code, further colourways, long sleeve and henley options, size set, private label and care labelling.

Pre-production sample approval, in-line inspection during cutting and sewing, and a final AQL inspection before packing, with measurement reports and photos shared before shipment.

Send us your tech pack, a photo or a reference garment and we will quote within 24 hours. Contact bafinasa@bafinasa.com or WhatsApp +86 13827222469.