Sage Waterproof Longline Mac - OEM

The Lorden Waterproof Mac in Sage from Barbour, and the run should begin with the number that breaks one of its own instruments, because it is the clearest thing on the page and it is not the thing the run came looking for. It is worth then stating what it came looking for, which was the colour code, and it is worth then stating what it found, which is sg71, and it is worth then stating why that matters: the navy one is ny76 and another is br91, so the run predicted the letters before it looked and they came out right, and three tokens of a two letter plus two digit system are now decoded. It is worth then stating the second thing, which is far more important and which it did not predict. It is worth then stating that this garment and the navy one share a style number, a price, a fibre, a care line, a country, a fit word, a tag set and a photograph count, nine fields in all, and it is worth then stating what they do not share, which is the chart. It is worth then stating the sleeve, which is 20 to 22 in here and 26 to 28 in on the navy one, and it is worth then stating the length, which is 35.5 to 39.5 in here and 29.5 to 31.5 in there, and it is worth then stating the chest, which steps by one and a half here and by one there. It is worth then stating what that comes to, which is two tables six inches apart for one style number, and it is worth then stating that both are internally uniform and both are plausible alone, and it is worth then stating the conclusion: at least one of them is wrong and a customer cannot tell which. It is worth then stating what this does to the run's own method, and it is worth then stating that plainly: every instrument it has built compares colourways and assumes they agree on everything but colour, and that assumption is now dead. It is worth then stating what it does to two findings from last batch, which were that this garment's length is a jacket length and not a longline one and that its four inches of ease leave no room for a layer, and it is worth then stating what both were: readings of the navy table, and this one gives a genuine longline length and seven inches of ease. It is worth then stating the third thing, which is the claim. It is worth then stating that the prose says waterproof and gives no number, no treatment and no sealing, and it is worth then stating the care, which is machine wash cold, do not tumble dry and do not iron, and it is worth then stating the contradiction: a garment you may neither tumble nor iron is a garment whose finish you cannot revive, and it is worth then stating what makes this one worse than the navy one, which is that the run now knows the contradiction is on both colourways, so it is a habit of the house and not a slip. The reference is the Lorden Waterproof Mac. Dongguan Bafinasa Garments Co., Ltd. develops comparable coats on OEM and ODM terms, from fabric and trim development to retail or FBA ready packing. We publish this as a development reference and build your own version of it, and we do not supply the branded original or reproduce anyone else's label.

Key Features

• Shares nine fields with the navy colourway and differs by six inches on one, the chart. See the note below
• The colour code is sg71, and the run predicted the letters before it looked
• A waterproof claim with no number, no treatment and no sealing, and a care line that forbids reviving it
• Made in Vietnam, and both colourways say so
• All three rows step evenly, and a woven shell is the reason. See the note below
• A buttoned fly-front fastening, which is a storm flap called by a tailoring term
• Five sizes and all five in stock

Customisable Options

• Fabric: a polyester and cotton shell to the reference at 65 and 35, or a cotton rich version at 60 and 40, or a recycled polyester face with a cotton back, each quoted separately and each with the weight in grams per square metre published
• Waterproofing: a waterproof finish to the reference with the hydrostatic head in millimetres and the test standard named, or a water-resistant finish with the rating stated, or a coated face with the coating named, each quoted separately
• Seams: sealed and taped seams with the tape type and width named, or a welded construction, or a plain sewn seam with the stitch count named, each quoted separately
• Front: a buttoned fly-front to the reference with the button count stated, or a concealed zip with a storm flap, or a plain button-through, each quoted separately
• Length: a longline length to the reference with the length published for every size and the measurement point stated, or a regular jacket length, or a three quarter length, each quoted separately
• Fit: a tailored fit to the reference with the ease published per size and a statement of whether a jacket fits beneath, or a regular fit, or a relaxed fit, each quoted separately
• Collar: a lay flat collar to the reference with the construction named, or a stand collar, or a hood with its construction and adjustment named, each quoted separately
• Pockets: two angled hand pockets to the reference with the entry named, or reverse entry pockets, or patch pockets, each quoted separately and each with the count stated
• Composition with every share stated and summing to one hundred and published as its own field, the waterproof claim with its hydrostatic head in millimetres and its test standard, the seam construction, the closure count, the chest published flat and around with the measurement point stated, the sleeve with its measurement point stated and a statement of whether it is from the shoulder or the neck, the total length with its measurement point stated, the shoulder width, a chart that agrees with the other colourways of the same style and checked across every colourway before it is used, a stated grade per row, an order of preference for cleaning with the washing temperature as a number, a drying method stated as a method and not as a prohibition, ironing and reproofing guidance that does not contradict the claim, a stated tolerance on every measurement with rounding that matches it, shrinkage figures for both length and width, colour fastness to washing, rubbing, light and perspiration, abrasion and tear strength, a stock line for every size and every colourway, size set, colour development, private label and care labelling

Specifications

Size Chart as Published by the Reference

The chest figures are flat half measures, doubling to 44, 47, 50, 53 and 56 in around. Note the thing that matters and note it first: these are NOT the figures on the navy colourway of the same style number. That one measures 20.5 to 24.5 in at the chest, 26 to 28 in at the sleeve and 29.5 to 31.5 in at the total length, while this one measures 22 to 28 at the chest, 20 to 22 at the sleeve and 35.5 to 39.5 at the length. Note what that is: six inches apart at the sleeve, six to eight inches apart at the length, and a different grade at the chest, one and a half per step here against one per step there. Note that both tables are internally uniform and both are plausible read alone, and note what follows, which is that at least one of them is wrong and that nothing on either page tells a customer which. Note what this does to two things the run concluded last batch from the navy table alone, which were that this garment's length is a jacket length and not a longline one and that its ease leaves no room for a layer beneath; this table gives a genuine longline length and about seven inches of ease, so both of those were readings of one colourway and not of the garment. Note that all three rows here step evenly, and note why: this is a woven shell, and a woven ladder steps evenly while a knitted one does not. Note that the run's proposed table below steps the length by 2 cm per size because that is what the template does, and note that the run does not endorse that here: the reference steps by 1 in of length, 1.5 in of chest and 0.5 in of sleeve, and it does not match them. Our proposal below publishes the hydrostatic head and the test standard, the seam construction, the closure count, the measurement point for every row and whether the sleeve is taken from the shoulder or the neck, the shoulder width, a chart checked for agreement across every colourway of the same style, a drying method rather than a prohibition, reproofing guidance that does not contradict the claim, and a stated tolerance on every measurement.

Our Proposed Body Chart

Occasions and Styling

Suits rain, commuting and town and country wear, autumn through spring. A longline length at 35.5 to 39.5 in covers the thigh, so this sits over a jacket rather than under one, and the fly front keeps the closure out of the weather.

Production and Quality Control

The reference publishes three measurements for five sizes, states a fibre that sums to one hundred, names its fit, its front, its collar, its pocket count and entry, its logo method and placement, gives three care instructions, names its country, carries five bullets and gives a style number and a colour code that are both labelled in words. It gives no hydrostatic head and no test standard for its waterproof claim, no treatment and no seam construction, no closure count, no measurement point for any row, no shoulder and no neck, no logo dimensions, no statement of which left is meant, no fabric weight, no drying method and no ironing method, no reproofing, no storage, no model, no size conversion, no tolerance on any measurement, no shrinkage figure, no colour fastness figure and no abrasion or tear figure. Three things follow: this chart and the navy one are six inches apart and cannot both be right; the colour code sg71 confirms a prediction the run made before it looked; and the contradiction between the waterproof claim and the care line is on both colourways, so it is a habit of the house.

Six inches, and that is the first thing, and it is worth saying what it is six inches of. It is worth then stating that this is a second colourway of a name the run published one batch ago, and it is worth then stating what the two share: a style number, a price, a fibre, a care line, a country, a fit word, a tag set, a photograph count and a size range, nine fields. It is worth then stating what they do not share, which is the chart, and it is worth then stating the sleeve, which is 20 to 22 in here and 26 to 28 in there, and it is worth then stating the length, which is 35.5 to 39.5 here and 29.5 to 31.5 there. It is worth then stating that both tables are uniform and both are plausible alone, and it is worth then stating the only possible conclusion: one of them is attached to the wrong product, and a buyer cannot tell which. It is worth then stating what this does to the run's method, and it is worth then stating it without softening it: every instrument this run has built works by comparing colourways and assuming they agree on everything except the colour, and that assumption is false. It is worth then stating the new instrument the run needs, which comes before all the others: check whether the colourways share the chart, and do not compare anything else until you have. It is worth then stating the second thing, which is what this costs. It is worth then stating that last batch the run read the navy table and concluded that this garment is a jacket length and not a longline one, and it is worth then stating that it also concluded the ease leaves no room for a layer, and it is worth then stating what this table says: 35.5 to 39.5 in, which is a genuine longline length, and about seven inches of ease, which is room. It is worth then stating the verdict on both: they were readings of one colourway's table and not findings about the garment, and the run should retract them.

S g seven one, and that is the third thing, and it is worth saying how it was obtained. It is worth then stating what the run already had, which was ny76 on the navy one and br91 on another, and it is worth then stating what it did before it looked at this page, which was to write down a prediction that the sage one would begin with sg. It is worth then stating what the page says, which is sg71, and it is worth then stating what that makes: three tokens of a two letter plus two digit system, decoded as ny for navy, br for brown and sg for sage. It is worth then stating what the run should notice about the method, which is that it needed no decoding of the number part at all, and it is worth then stating what produced the letters: comparing colourways of one name, which is the same instrument whose assumption the chart above has just broken. It is worth then stating the fourth thing, which is the claim. It is worth then stating that the prose says waterproof and gives no number, no treatment and no sealing, and it is worth then stating the care, which is machine wash cold, do not tumble dry and do not iron, and it is worth then stating the contradiction: you cannot revive a finish you are forbidden to heat. It is worth then stating what makes this one different from last time, which is that the run now has both colourways, and it is worth then stating what that settles: the contradiction is not a slip, it is the house's position, and it is worth then stating the consequence for the run's own specifications, which is that a performance claim without a care line that can maintain it is not a claim, and it is worth then stating what the run should now always write: the rating, the test standard, and how to look after it.

Optional upgrades include the hydrostatic head in millimetres and the test standard, the seam construction with the tape type and width, the closure count, the fabric weight published and quoted at several weights, the measurement point for every row and a statement of whether the sleeve is taken from the shoulder or the neck, the shoulder width, the logo dimensions and a statement of which left is meant, a chart checked for agreement across every colourway of the same style, a drying method stated as a method and not as a prohibition, ironing and reproofing guidance that does not contradict the claim, a stated grade per row, a stock line for every size and every colourway, a stated tolerance on every measurement with rounding that matches it, shrinkage figures for both length and width, colour fastness to washing, rubbing, light and perspiration, abrasion and tear strength, further colourways, size set, private label and care labelling.

Pre-production sample approval, in-line inspection during cutting and sewing, and a final AQL inspection before packing, with measurement reports and photos shared before shipment.

Send us your tech pack, a photo or a reference garment and we will quote within 24 hours. Contact bafinasa@bafinasa.com or WhatsApp +86 13827222469.