Raven Long Sleeve Embroidered Organic Cotton T-Shirt - OEM

The L/S American Script T-Shirt in Raven from Carhartt WIP, and the run should begin with two numbers and then with what they cost it, because this batch turned on following a sentence. It is worth then stating the first number, which is 240 grams per square metre, and it is worth then stating what that is, which is the first fabric weight in this run, and it is worth then stating where it sits, which is on the cheapest garment here and not on the most expensive one, and it is worth then stating what that proves: specification is not bought by price. It is worth then stating the second number, which is 89, and it is worth then stating where it came from: this garment's code is I029955 dash 3T6.XX, and the black colourway's is I029955 dash 89.XX, and the run then searched its own archive for 89. It is worth then stating what it found, which is the Landon Pant from the same house, already published by this run, carrying I030468 dash 89.06, and it is worth then stating what that settles: 89 recurs across two different names from one house and almost certainly means black. It is worth then stating what it also settles, which is that XX is a placeholder, and it is worth then stating why: the pant has 06 in the position where the tee has XX, so the field is normally a number and here it was never filled. It is worth then stating the third thing, which is how the run got to the archive at all. It is worth then stating that the prose on this page says pair with some Landon jeans, and it is worth then stating that the run treated that as boilerplate in earlier batches, and it is worth then stating what it did this time: it followed it. It is worth then stating what following it produced, which is the decoding above and a correction to a rule the run had written one batch earlier. It is worth then stating that rule, which was that a component with a cost moves the price and a finish does not, and it is worth then stating what the archive showed: the Landon Pant is 95 stone washed and 85 single rinsed, so a finish moved the price by ten at this very house. It is worth then stating the corrected rule: whether a named process is priced is a decision of the house, not a property of the process, and it is worth then stating the evidence: Carhartt prices it, Gramicci does not. The reference is the L/S American Script T-Shirt. Dongguan Bafinasa Garments Co., Ltd. develops comparable t-shirts on OEM and ODM terms, from fabric and trim development to retail or FBA ready packing. We publish this as a development reference and build your own version of it, and we do not supply the branded original or reproduce anyone else's label.

Key Features

• 240 g/m虏 given, the first fabric weight in this run, on the cheapest garment here. See the note below
• The code reads I029955 - 3T6.XX, and the XX is an unfilled placeholder. See the note below
• The token 89 was decoded as black by following the description's cross-reference into the run's own archive. See the note below
• The prose names another product, Landon jeans, and following it overturned a rule the run wrote one batch earlier. See the note below
• A long sleeve at 23.5 to 25 in, against 8.5 to 10 in on the short sleeve tee this run met
• Embroidered logo on the left chest, a method named, and no size given for it
• Made in Bangladesh, the first for this run

Customisable Options

• Fabric: a cotton single jersey to the reference with the weight stated in grams per square metre, quoted at 240, at 180 and at 300 separately, or a cotton and polyester blend, or a ring spun combed cotton, each quoted separately
• Weight: a heavyweight jersey of 240 grams per square metre to the reference, or a midweight of 180, or a lightweight of 150, each quoted separately and each with the weight published
• Fit: a loose fit to the reference with the chest, the body length and the sleeve all stated, or a regular fit, or an oversized fit, each quoted separately and each with the ease published per size
• Sleeve: a long sleeve to the reference with the sleeve length published and the measurement point stated, or a short sleeve, or a three quarter sleeve, each quoted separately
• Logo: an embroidered logo on the left chest to the reference with the method, the placement and the dimensions stated, or a printed logo with the print method named, each quoted separately
• Left side: the wearer's left or the viewer's left stated, because the run has now met this ambiguity twice
• Composition with every share stated and summing to one hundred and published as its own field, the fabric weight in grams per square metre and the fabric construction named, the organic claim with its certifier, its standard and its licence number, the chest published flat and around with the measurement point stated, the body length with its measurement point stated, the sleeve with its measurement point stated, the shoulder width, the neck with its construction named, a chart whose columns match the sizes actually offered and checked in both directions, a stated grade per row, a statement of which sizes share a measurement, a stock line for every size and every colourway, an order of preference for cleaning with the washing temperature as a number, a drying method stated as a method and not as a prohibition, ironing and storage guidance, a stated tolerance on every measurement with rounding that matches it, shrinkage figures for both length and width, colour fastness to washing, rubbing, light and perspiration, pilling resistance tested to a stated number of cycles, size set, colour development, private label and care labelling

Specifications

Size Chart as Published by the Reference

The chest figures are flat half measures, doubling to 40, 43, 45 and 47 in around. Note the fabric weight, which is 240 grams per square metre, and note that this is the first time this run has been given one, and note where it sits: on the cheapest garment here and not on the most expensive. Note the sleeve, which is 23.5 to 25 in, and note what that settles: this is a long sleeve, against 8.5 to 10 in on the short sleeve tee this run met, so a number settles what a name only hints at. Note the chart columns, which are XS, S, M and L, against sizes sold of S, M, L and XL, and note that this is identical on all three colourways, so the largest size sold has no measurement anywhere. Note that the smallest two sizes share a length of 28 in and the middle two share a sleeve of 24 in. Note that the run's proposed table below steps the length by 2 cm per size because that is what the template does, and note that the run does not endorse that here: the reference steps are 0, 1.5 and 0.5 in. Our proposal below publishes the fabric weight and offers it at several weights, the certifier for the organic claim, the measurement points for every row, the shoulder and the neck, the logo dimensions and which left is meant, a chart whose columns match the sizes sold, a drying method rather than a prohibition, and a stated tolerance on every measurement.

Our Proposed Body Chart

Occasions and Styling

Suits everyday wear, layering and workwear, autumn through spring. Raven is a near black that reads softer than a true black under an overshirt, and at 240 grams per square metre the jersey hangs rather than clings.

Production and Quality Control

The reference publishes three measurements for four charted sizes, states a fibre that sums to one hundred, names its fabric construction, states a fabric weight in grams per square metre, names its sleeve type, its fit, its logo method and its logo placement, gives two care instructions with the washing temperature as a number, names its country, carries four bullets and gives a style number with a style part and a colour part. It gives no certifier for its organic claim, no measurement point for any row, no shoulder and no neck, no logo dimensions, no statement of which left is meant, no drying method and no ironing method, no storage, no model, no size conversion, no tolerance on any measurement, no statement of which sizes share a measurement, no shrinkage figure, no colour fastness figure and no pilling figure, its chart does not cover the largest size it sells, and its colour code carries an unfilled placeholder. Three things follow: 240 grams per square metre is the first weight this run has been given and it is on the cheapest garment; the token 89 decodes as black once the run reads its own archive; and following a styling sentence overturned a price rule written one batch earlier.

Two hundred and forty, and that is the first thing, and it is worth saying how long the run has waited for it. It is worth then stating that the run has been asking every garment for a fabric weight in grams per square metre since early in this series, and it is worth then stating what it has been given until now, which is nothing at all. It is worth then stating what this page gives, which is 240, and it is worth then stating that it also names the construction, which is single jersey, and it is worth then stating the price, which is 45. It is worth then stating the comparison that matters: another garment in this run costs 199 and states no weight, no construction and no number behind its one claim. It is worth then stating the conclusion, which is that specification is not bought by price, and it is worth then stating what the run should take from it: the number is cheap to publish, and the houses that publish it are not the ones charging for it. It is worth then stating the second thing, which is a code. It is worth then stating that this garment reads I029955 dash 3T6.XX, and it is worth then stating that the black one reads I029955 dash 89.XX, and it is worth then stating what XX is: a placeholder, and to prove it the run needs only this house's other name, where the same position holds 06. It is worth then stating what the run did next, which was search its own archive for 89, and it is worth then stating what came back: the Landon Pant, already published by this run, carrying I030468 dash 89.06. It is worth then stating the verdict: 89 recurs across two different names from one house and almost certainly means black, and it is worth then stating the method that produced it, which is comparison within a house and not decoding.

Pair with some Landon jeans, and that is the third thing, and it is worth saying what the run used to do with sentences like that. It is worth then stating what it assumed, which is that a styling sentence is boilerplate, and it is worth then stating what it did with the earlier ones it met, which was to note them and move on. It is worth then stating what it did this time, which was to follow the pointer, and it is worth then stating where it led: into this run's own published archive, to two colourways of the Landon Pant from the same house. It is worth then stating what re-reading them produced, which is a correction. It is worth then stating the rule the run had written one batch earlier, which was that a component with a cost moves the price and a finish does not, and it is worth then stating what the archive says: the Landon Pant is 95 stone washed and 85 single rinsed, so a finish moved the price by ten, at the same house whose t-shirts this batch is about. It is worth then stating the corrected rule: whether a named process is priced is a decision of the house and not a property of the process, and it is worth then stating the evidence on both sides: Carhartt prices a stone wash and Allevol priced a named zipper, while Gramicci did not price a pigment dye across four colourways. It is worth then stating what the run should conclude about itself, which is that it has now revised a price rule in three consecutive batches, and it is worth then stating why: it keeps generalising from one house, and it should write these as house-level observations and check them against a second house before calling them rules. It is worth then stating the final thing, which is cheap and worth keeping: treat a product name inside a description as a pointer, and follow it.

Optional upgrades include the certifier, the standard and the licence number for the organic claim, the fabric weight published and quoted at several weights, the logo dimensions and a statement of which left is meant, the measurement point for the chest, the sleeve and the length, the shoulder and the neck with its construction, a chart whose columns match the sizes actually offered, a stock line for every size and every colourway, a drying method stated as a method and not as a prohibition, ironing and storage guidance, a stated grade per row, a statement of which sizes share a measurement, a stated tolerance on every measurement with rounding that matches it, shrinkage figures for both length and width, colour fastness to washing, rubbing, light and perspiration, pilling resistance tested to a stated number of cycles, further colourways, size set, private label and care labelling.

Pre-production sample approval, in-line inspection during cutting and sewing, and a final AQL inspection before packing, with measurement reports and photos shared before shipment.

Send us your tech pack, a photo or a reference garment and we will quote within 24 hours. Contact bafinasa@bafinasa.com or WhatsApp +86 13827222469.