Navy Striped Wide Leg Trousers - Heavyweight Cotton Pantaloons for OEM

Navy and white striped trousers from Les Vacances d'Irina cut in a heavyweight cotton with a wide leg, deep pockets and a comfortable elasticated waistband, listed at 420 GBP with all three sizes in stock. The measurement table is the interesting part, because it publishes waist, inseam and total length separately, and doing so exposes something a single row would have hidden: the inseam is fixed at 75 cm across all three sizes while the total length grows, which means the leg is not what changes between sizes, the rise is. That is an unusual way to build a trouser and it has consequences worth setting out before anyone copies it. The reference is the Striped Pantaloons, style FW26-TR-006-NA. Dongguan Bafinasa Garments Co., Ltd. develops comparable trousers on OEM and ODM terms, from cloth selection and stripe development to retail or FBA ready packing. We publish this as a development reference and build your own version of it, and we do not supply the branded original or reproduce anyone else's label.

Key Features

• Waist, inseam and total length published as three separate rows for all three sizes
• A fixed 75 cm inseam across every size, with the rise doing the grading. See the note below
• Heavyweight 100% cotton as stated, in a navy and white stripe
• Wide leg silhouette as stated
• Deep pockets as stated
• Elasticated waistband as stated, which is what makes the published waist figure workable
• Dry clean only on cotton, which is worth a closer look. See the note below

Customisable Options

• Cloth: heavyweight cotton to the reference, with weight stated in ounces or grams per square metre since it is not
• Leg: wide to the reference, or tapered, or straight
• Waist: elasticated to the reference, or a flat front with a concealed elastic panel at the back, or a fixed waistband with a zip
• Rise: graded rise to the reference, or a fixed rise with a graded inseam, which is the more usual way round
• Inseam: fixed at 75 cm to the reference, or graded, or offered in short, regular and long
• Pocket: deep side pockets to the reference, with position and bag depth adjustable
• Cloth weight, stripe repeat, leg width, pocket depth, size set, colour development, private label and care labelling

Specifications

Size Chart as Published by the Reference

The waist figures are flat half measures taken with the trouser laid down, doubling to 58, 62 and 66 cm around, or 22.8, 24.4 and 26.0 in. Our size S body measures 26 in at the waist, so the relaxed waist is smaller than the body it is meant to fit and the elastic is doing the rest, which is exactly how an elasticated waistband is supposed to work and worth stating so nobody reads the number as a too small garment. The more interesting row is the inseam: 75 cm on every size, unchanged, while total length goes 100, 101 and 102 cm. Subtracting one from the other gives a rise of about 25, 26 and 27 cm, so the grading between sizes happens entirely above the crotch. The leg does not get longer, the body gets taller.

Our Proposed Body Chart

Occasions and Styling

Suits everyday wear, weekends, resort and travel, and relaxed workplaces. A wide leg in a heavyweight cotton reads as a trouser rather than a trouser substitute, so it pairs with a plain tee or the matching striped shirt the reference suggests, and the elasticated waist makes it comfortable for long travel days, at the cost of a waistline that will not sit flat under a fitted top.

Production and Quality Control

The reference publishes waist, inseam and total length as three separate rows for all three sizes, which is rarer than it should be and which lets the construction be read off the table rather than guessed. The numbers are internally consistent. Three things follow: what a fixed inseam and a graded rise mean, how to read a waist figure smaller than the body, and why dry clean only on cotton is the claim worth challenging.

A fixed inseam with a graded rise, and that is the first thing. Read the three rows together and the trouser builds itself: 75 cm of leg on all three sizes, 100 to 102 cm of total length, so the difference between sizes sits entirely in the rise. Most trousers are built the other way round, with the rise roughly constant and the inseam growing by a centimetre or two per size, and there is a reason for that, which is that most wearers who size up are taller and want a longer leg rather than a longer body. Here, someone who is tall enough to need the size L gets two centimetres more rise and not one millimetre more leg, so the extra length lands above the waistband and does nothing for where the hem falls. That is not automatically wrong. If the intended wearer is the same height across the size range and the size variation is all in the waist and hip, then grading the rise and holding the leg is arguably the more correct construction, and it also keeps the hem at a consistent place relative to the floor for everyone, which on a wide leg trouser with a striped cloth matters, because a stripe at the hem draws the eye to exactly that line. But it is a decision that should be stated, because a tall customer shopping by inseam, which is the one trouser measurement people reliably know about themselves, will find the number they looked for is the same on every size and conclude the page is broken. Publishing the intended height range alongside it costs a sentence and removes the doubt.

A waist that measures smaller than the body, and how to say that without confusing anyone, and that is the second thing. The relaxed waist is 58 cm around, or 22.8 in, and our size S body measures 26 in. Read naively that says the trousers are three inches too small, and it is the kind of figure that generates returns from customers who measured themselves, found a smaller number than their own waist, and ordered the next size up unnecessarily. The elasticated waistband is the whole explanation: the garment is cut to sit close when relaxed so that it grips, and it opens to pass over the hips and then recovers. This is not a defect and it is not an error in the table, but it is a place where publishing a measurement without publishing the state it was taken in creates a problem that did not need to exist. Two fixes, both cheap. Say relaxed and stretched, and give both figures, since a waistband that opens to one and a half times its relaxed width and one that barely opens are very different garments to wear and to make. Or say plainly that the waist is elasticated and to choose on hip measurement, which is what actually determines whether these go on. There is a production point hiding in it too. An elasticated waist of this kind needs the elastic specified by width and by modulus, and whoever makes these will have chosen both; if neither is written down, two production runs can differ noticeably in how firm the waist feels while both passing a measurement inspection, which is precisely the failure this series keeps finding in garments where the comfort comes from a component rather than from the cut.

Dry clean only, on cotton, and that is the third thing worth working through. This run has now assembled cotton doing a great many different things, and the lesson has been consistent throughout: the fibre rarely sets the care instruction, the construction and the finish do. Cotton tolerates water better than almost anything else in common use, so a heavyweight plain cotton trouser would normally wash without complaint. Something else here is setting the ceiling, and the candidates are the stripe, the weight and the make. A heavyweight cloth holds a great deal of water and dries slowly, and slow drying on a heavy striped cotton is a recipe for shading and for the stripe bleeding into the ground. A wide leg with deep pockets and an elasticated waist has enough structure, and enough different components, that shrinkage rates between cloth, pocketing and elastic will not match in a wash, and mismatched shrinkage is what distorts a waistband. Dry clean only is therefore a defensible instruction, and the point is not that it is wrong but that nothing on the page connects it to anything, so a customer cannot tell whether it is caution or necessity, and a developer cannot tell what would have to change to make the garment washable. Our own view is that this one is worth testing rather than inheriting: a pre shrunk cloth, a colourfast stripe and a matched elastic would very likely allow a cold machine wash, and that is worth more commercially than the safety of repeating the reference. No lining is stated, none is likely needed on a heavyweight cotton, and no cloth weight is given at all, only the word heavyweight, which is the single missing number that would let anyone cost or reproduce this. Every bulk shipment gets a measurement report against your approved chart.

Optional upgrades include stating the cloth weight in ounces or grams per square metre, since heavyweight is not a number and this garment cannot be costed without one, publishing both the relaxed and the stretched waist so the elastic can be judged rather than guessed, offering a graded inseam alongside the graded rise so taller customers can buy on leg length, or stating the intended height range if the fixed inseam is deliberate, adding a flat front waistband with a concealed back elastic for anyone who wants the comfort without the gathered look, spec and test the elastic by width and modulus so two production runs feel the same, wash testing the stripe for bleeding before committing to the dry clean instruction, offering short, regular and long inseams on the same block, pocket depth and position, leg width, stripe repeat, size set, colour development, private label, hangtag and care labelling.

Pre-production sample approval, in-line inspection during cutting and sewing, and a final AQL inspection before packing, with measurement reports and photos shared before shipment.

Send us your tech pack, a photo or a reference garment and we will quote within 24 hours. Contact bafinasa@bafinasa.com or WhatsApp +86 13827222469.