
The Mid Century T-Shirt in Forest green from Museum of Peace and Quiet, and the run should begin by saying what makes it worth a second look, which is not the tee itself but the house it sits in. It is worth then stating why, which is that this run published the Diner T-Shirt from the same house earlier, and it is worth then stating what that lets the run do: its second house test. It is worth then stating the first house test, which was Universal Works, and it is worth then stating what UW gave: a pant, a mac and a chino, three different garment types, and almost nothing held across them. It is worth then stating what MOPQ gives: two prints of one tee, and it is worth then stating what holds: the fibre, the fit word, the neck, the care line, the country and the price are identical, and the size chart is identical to the last figure. It is worth then stating what that does NOT mean, which is that this house is consistent, because it is not yet a house test, it is a style test, and it is worth then stating the difference, which is that you cannot call a shared spec a house habit until the house has given you more than one garment type, and MOPQ has not. It is worth then stating the thing that does survive the caution, which is the chart. It is worth then stating that the chart is shared across the two prints exactly, every figure, and it is worth then stating the other house that did this: Newel gave two colourways of one trouser with one chart, so the size chart travels with the garment body, not with the colourway and not with the print, and the stock travels with the listing, and that is now a cross house result. It is worth then stating the second thing, which is a band the run can finally name. It is worth then stating the sleeve, which runs 8.75 to 9.75 inches, and it is worth then stating what that is, which is the short sleeve band the run left hanging at eight to nine, and it is worth then stating what sits below it: nothing, and what sits above it: the twenty four to twenty six inches this run measured on its long sleeves. It is worth then stating the third thing, which is the print, and it is worth then stating that this is the only body difference between the two tees. It is worth then stating what the page says: a small chest graphic print and a large back graphic print, and it is worth then stating what it does not say: the method and the dimensions, which is the standing gap. It is worth then stating the fourth thing, which is the season, and it is worth then stating the code, which reads MOPQ-SU26-02 FOR, so the house codes summer twenty six and the shop files it under autumn winter twenty six, the same conflict the Diner carried. The reference is the Mid Century T-Shirt. Dongguan Bafinasa Garments Co., Ltd. develops comparable jersey on OEM and ODM terms, from fabric and trim development to retail or FBA ready packing. We publish this as a development reference and build your own version of it, and we do not supply the branded original or reproduce anyone else's label.
Key Features
- The second house test this run can run, and the contrast is the point: UW gave three garment types and almost nothing held, MOPQ gives two prints of one tee and almost everything does. See the note below
- A size chart shared across print variants, identical to the last figure, so the chart travels with the body and not with the print. See the note below
- The same chart sharing this run saw at Newel across colourways, so it is now a cross house result, not a one off. See the note below
- Stock differs from the sibling despite the shared chart, so the stock travels with the listing and not with the chart. See the note below
- A short sleeve benchmark the run can finally name: 8.75 to 9.75 in, the hanging 8 to 9 band, far below the 24 to 26 in long sleeves
- The only body difference between the two tees is the print, and even that gives no method and no dimensions. See the note below
- A season conflict that is a house habit here: the code says SU26 and the collection says AW26, as the Diner did. See the note below
- Care written for the print and not the cloth, and two temperatures on one line, washing cold and ironing cool. See the note below
Customisable Options
- Fabric: a cotton jersey to the reference with the weight in grams per square metre stated, or a heavier jersey with the weight given, or a combed or ring spun cotton with the yarn count stated, each quoted separately. See the note below
- Fit: a regular fit to the reference with the ease published for every size, or a fit that holds its ease across the range with the chest grade set to the body grade, each quoted separately. See the note below
- Ladder: one grade per row checked row by row, and the top size extended by the same step as the rest. See the note below
- Print: a chest and back graphic print to the reference with the print method named and the wash and rub fastness tested, with the chest and back positions and dimensions stated, or a chest only print as on the sibling, or a placement print elsewhere with the position stated, each quoted separately
- Chart: no column for a size that is not sold, every column matched to the offer, and sold-out sizes marked. See the note below
- Composition with every share stated and summing to one hundred, the fabric weight in grams per square metre, the yarn count, chest with the flat or round method stated, sleeve length with the measurement point stated, the back length with the measurement point stated, shoulder width, the neck width and rib depth, a chart whose columns match the sizes on offer, an order of preference for cleaning with the washing temperature and the ironing temperature given separately, drying and storage guidance, shrinkage figures for both length and width, a pilling grade tested after a stated number of cycles, colour fastness to washing, rubbing, light and perspiration, print durability tested and published, a stock line for every size, size set including the extended sizes, colour development, private label and care labelling
Specifications
| Style | Regular fit crewneck t-shirt in 100% cotton with a small chest graphic print and a large back graphic print |
| Reference | Museum of Peace and Quiet, Mid Century T-Shirt, colour Forest, sizes M to XXL |
| House | Museum of Peace and Quiet, and this is the SECOND garment from this house this run. See the note below |
| House Test | THE SECOND THIS RUN CAN RUN, and it contrasts with Universal Works. See the note below |
| House Test Contrast | UW gave three garment types and almost nothing held; MOPQ gives two prints of one tee and almost everything holds. See the note below |
| House Habit Or Style Habit | MOPQ has not given a second garment type, so what holds here holds for the style, not proven for the house. See the note below |
| Sibling | The Diner T-Shirt Forest, published this run at id 2869, is the same house, same colour, same price, same chart. See the note below |
| Colours Compared | One, so this garment gives no colourway test on its own, but the sibling is the same colour, so the colourway test is moot and the print test is the one that runs |
| Unit | Inches, throughout, and the centimetre test does not take on any row |
| Column Count | Five, as S, M, L, XL and XXL |
| Size Labels | Letters, so the label cannot be checked against the measurement directly |
| Sizes Offered | M, L, XL and XXL, four sizes |
| Sizes In Stock | M and XL only, and the L and the XXL are sold out. See the note below |
| Stock Compared | M and XL here against XL and XXL on the sibling, so the two share a chart and a stock count of two but not the same two. See the note below |
| Option List | Size = M, L, XL, XXL, the same set as the chart minus S, so all four offered sizes are charted |
| Sizes Charted Not Offered | S, which has figures and no listing. See the note below |
| Sizes Offered Not Charted | NONE |
| Size Run | Starts at M and ends at XXL, and the run should stop treating S to XL as the default |
| Size Conversion | Not stated, the sizes given as letters only |
| Chest | Pit to pit 20.75, 22.75, 24.75, 26.75 and 27.25 in, or 41.5 to 54.5 in around |
| Chest Compared | Identical to the sibling Diner to the last figure, so the chart is shared across prints. See the note below |
| Chest Grading | 2, 2, 2 and 0.5 in, and the last step collapses to a quarter of the others. See the note below |
| Chest Grade Compared | Identical to the sibling, so the collapse is a property of the shared body |
| Ladder Uniformity | Broken, on one row out of three. See the note below |
| Ease at the Chest | 4.5, 6.5, 8.5, 10.5 and 9.5 in, and the last one falls. See the note below |
| Ease Drift | Rises 2 in per size for four sizes, then falls 1 in, exactly as the run's formula predicts. See the note below |
| Formula Tested | On a collapsing ladder, and it predicted the break, and now on a second garment with the same ladder. See the note below |
| Waist | Not measured |
| Shoulder | Not measured |
| Sleeve | 8.75, 9, 9.25, 9.5 and 9.75 in, and the steps are a uniform quarter inch |
| Sleeve Band | 8.75 to 9.75 in, the short sleeve band the run left hanging at 8 to 9, far below the 24 to 26 in long sleeves. See the note below |
| Sleeve Compared | Identical to the sibling, so the short sleeve band holds across the house's tees |
| Sleeve Ladder | Uniform, so two of the three rows hold and one breaks |
| Sleeve Row Label | Sleeve, with no sleeve type and no measurement point stated |
| Total Length | 26, 27, 28, 29 and 30 in, and the steps are a uniform one inch |
| Length Ladder | Uniform |
| Length Measurement Point | Not stated |
| Neck | Crewneck, as stated, with no neck width and no rib depth given |
| Small chest graphic print and large back graphic print, as stated, with no print method and no dimensions given | |
| Print Compared | The only body difference from the sibling, which has the chest print only. See the note below |
| Print Method | Not stated on either tee, so the standing gap holds |
| Composition | 100% Cotton, as stated in the bullets and in a tab |
| Composition Compared | Identical to the sibling |
| Fabric Weight | Not stated, in any form, and this is a t-shirt. See the note below |
| Fabric Weight Compared | Not stated on the sibling either, so this house gives none |
| Yarn Count | Not stated |
| Certification | None named |
| Fit Word | Regular, as stated, and the same word as the sibling |
| Care | Machine wash cold, wash inside out, cool iron when needed, as stated |
| Care Written For | The print, and not the cloth. See the note below |
| Care Compared | Identical to the sibling, so care travels with the body |
| Washing Temperature | Cold, as stated, and not as a number |
| Ironing Temperature | Cool, as stated, and not as a number. See the note below |
| Two Temperatures | Washing and ironing, so the temperature field is not one field. See the note below |
| Drying | Not stated |
| Storage | Not stated |
| Bullet List | Four, covering the fibre, the fit, the neck and the print |
| Bullet Compared | Identical to the sibling except the print bullet, which adds the back |
| Carry Over Tag | YES: __carry over, and the sibling published earlier this run carries none, so within one house the tag is not consistent. See the note below |
| Carry Over Watch | The two may sit in different collections, so this is a watch and not yet a break of the carry over against age pattern |
| Photographs | Two files listed, against two on the sibling |
| Filename Convention | Dash numbered, Forest-1 and Forest-2, the same as the sibling |
| Upload Stamps | A single stamp of 1782126831 across both files, and far older than the recent batches. See the note below |
| Style Number | MOPQ-SU26-02 FOR, as stated, and the run can read it in full. See the note below |
| Code Read As | House, season and year, garment number, colour. See the note below |
| Season Conflict | The code says summer 2026 and the collection says autumn winter 2026, and the sibling carries the same conflict. See the note below |
| Season Conflict As Habit | Both tees from this house show it, so it reads as a house habit, though it may be the shop's filing. See the note below |
| Reference Retail | 59 GBP as listed, the same as the sibling, quoted to show the price band this sits in, not as our price |
| Category | Filed by the reference under t-shirts |
| Occasion | Everyday, layering, weekends, spring and summer |
| MOQ | 100 pcs per style per colourway, mixed sizes and colourways accepted |
| Sampling | 7-10 days after tech pack or reference sample confirmation |
| Bulk Lead Time | 20-30 days after sample approval and deposit |
| Service | OEM / ODM / private label, cotton jersey sourcing with the weight in grams per square metre and the yarn count stated, combed, ring spun, slub and organic cotton options with the certifier and licence number given, crewneck, V neck and wide neck development with the neck width and rib depth published, chest, sleeve and length grading checked row by row with the top size extended by the same step as the rest, chest grading set to the body grade if the fit is to hold across the range, chart columns matched to the sizes on offer with no column for a size that is not sold, chest and back placement, screen, discharge and digital print development with the print method named and the position and dimensions stated, wash and rub fastness tested, an order of preference for cleaning with the washing and ironing temperatures given separately, drying and storage guidance, shrinkage measured in both directions and published, a pilling grade tested after a stated number of cycles, colour fastness to washing, rubbing, light and perspiration, print durability tested and published, extended size runs, a stock line for every size and colourway, size set, colour development, private label and care labelling, retail or FBA ready packing |
Size Chart as Published by the Reference
| Size | Pit to Pit (inches) | Sleeve (inches) | Length (inches) |
|---|---|---|---|
| S | 20.75 in | 8.75 in | 26 in |
| M | 22.75 in | 9 in | 27 in |
| L | 24.75 in | 9.25 in | 28 in |
| XL | 26.75 in | 9.5 in | 29 in |
| XXL | 27.25 in | 9.75 in | 30 in |
The pit to pit figures are flat half measures, doubling to 41.5, 45.5, 49.5, 53.5 and 54.5 in around. Against men's bodies of roughly 37 to 45 in at the chest, the ease is 4.5, 6.5, 8.5, 10.5 and 9.5 in. Note the first four, which rise by exactly two inches at every size, and note what the run's formula gives for a chest grade of two inches against a body grade of two, which is plus two. Note the fifth, which falls by one inch, and note what the formula gives for the collapsed grade of half an inch, which is minus one. Note that the formula predicted the break before the run read it, and note that it does so on a second garment with the same ladder: the sibling Diner T-Shirt carries the identical chart, so the collapse is a property of the shared body. Note the other two rows, which are uniform: the sleeve at a quarter inch and the length at one inch. Note that only one of the three rows breaks, and note what that means for any check the run writes: the ladder check must be per row. Note the sleeve band, which runs 8.75 to 9.75 in and is the run's hanging short sleeve band, confirmed against the 24 to 26 in it measured on long sleeves. Note the chart columns, and note that S is charted and not offered, so the chart carries a column for a size that is not sold, and note that the stock is M and XL here against XL and XXL on the sibling, so the stock travels with the listing and not with the chart. Our proposal below publishes the fabric weight, the yarn count, the measurement points, the print method with the chest and back positions and dimensions, the ease for every size, and a chart whose columns match the offer.
Our Proposed Body Chart
| Size | Sleeve | Body Waist | Body Hips | Length | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M | 22 cm | 33 in / 84 cm | 39 in / 99 cm | 66 cm / 26 in | Our proposal |
| L | 23 cm | 35 in / 89 cm | 41 in / 104 cm | 68 cm / 26.8 in | Our proposal |
| XL | 24 cm | 37 in / 94 cm | 43 in / 109 cm | 70 cm / 27.6 in | Our proposal |
| XXL | 25 cm | 39 in / 99 cm | 45 in / 114 cm | 72 cm / 28.3 in | Our proposal |
Occasions and Styling
Suits everyday wear, layering, weekends and spring and summer. A plain cotton tee with a small chest print and a large back print carries on its own or under a shirt or a knit, and the prints stay quiet enough at the front to go under anything.
Production and Quality Control
The reference publishes three measurements for five sizes against four on offer, states its fibre with a share and states it in two places that agree, gives a fit word, names its neck, names its print, gives a care line, gives its country of manufacture and its style code, and carries four bullets and two photographs. It gives no fabric weight, no yarn count, no certifier, no shoulder width, no waist, no sleeve type, no sleeve or length measurement point, no neck width, no rib depth, no print method, no print dimensions, no washing temperature although it says cold, no ironing temperature although it says cool, no drying instruction, no storage guidance, no model, no size conversion, no shrinkage figure, no pilling grade and no abrasion grade, no statement of whether any figure is flat or round, and a chart column for a size that is not sold. Three things follow: a chart shared across print variants, identical to the sibling Diner to the last figure; a short sleeve band confirmed at 8.75 to 9.75 in; and a house test that contrasts with Universal Works, where three garment types held almost nothing in common and here two prints of one tee hold almost everything, which proves that a shared spec cannot be called a house habit until the house has given more than one garment type.
Two prints, and that is the first thing, and it is worth saying what the run can now see because it has the sibling. It is worth then stating what the two tees share, which is the fibre, the fit word, the neck, the care line, the country, the price and the size chart to the last figure. It is worth then stating what they do not share, which is the print and the stock. It is worth then stating what that makes the chart, which is a property of the garment body and not of the print, and it is worth then stating the other house that showed this: Newel gave two colourways of one trouser with one chart, so the chart travels with the body and not with the colourway either, and the stock travels with the listing in both houses. It is worth then stating the caution, which is that MOPQ has given only one garment type, so what holds here is a style habit and not yet a house habit, and it is worth then stating why that matters: the Universal Works test failed precisely because the run assumed a house would be consistent, and here the run must not assume the reverse from a single type. It is worth then stating the band, which is the second thing. It is worth then stating the sleeve, which runs 8.75 to 9.75 inches, and it is worth then stating what the run left hanging, which was whether a short sleeve sat at eight to nine, and it is worth then stating what sits below and above it: nothing below and the twenty four to twenty six inches of the long sleeves above. It is worth then stating the print, which is the third thing. It is worth then stating that the only body difference is the back print, and it is worth then stating what neither page gives: the method and the dimensions, which is the standing gap the run has now met on every printed garment. It is worth then stating the season, which is the fourth thing. It is worth then stating the code, which reads MOPQ-SU26-02 FOR, so the house codes summer and the shop files autumn winter, and it is worth then stating that the sibling carries the same conflict, so it reads as a house habit although it may be the shop's filing. It is worth then stating the tag, which is the last thing. It is worth then stating that this one carries a carry over tag and the sibling does not, and it is worth then stating what that means: within one house the tag is not consistent, though the two may sit in different collections, so the run should watch it and not yet call it a break.
Optional upgrades include the fabric weight in grams per square metre and the yarn count, combed, ring spun, slub and organic cotton options with the certifier and licence number given, chest, sleeve and length grading checked row by row with the top size extended by the same step, chest grading set to the body grade if the fit is to hold, a chart whose columns match the sizes on offer with no column for a size that is not sold, the shoulder width, the neck width and rib depth, the sleeve type and measurement point, the length measurement point, chest and back placement, screen, discharge and digital print development with the print method named and the chest and back positions and dimensions stated, the washing temperature and the ironing temperature given separately, drying and storage guidance, shrinkage figures for both length and width, a pilling grade tested after a stated number of cycles, colour fastness to washing, rubbing, light and perspiration, print durability tested and published, a stock line for every size, size set including the extended sizes, colour development, private label and care labelling.
Pre-production sample approval, in-line inspection during cutting and sewing, and a final AQL inspection before packing, with measurement reports and photos shared before shipment.
Send us your tech pack, a photo or a reference garment and we will quote within 24 hours. Contact bafinasa@bafinasa.com or WhatsApp +86 13827222469.

