



A floor length gown in a lightweight jersey listed as 72% polyamide and 28% elastane, unlined, pulled on, with a front cut-out, adjustable shoulder straps, hand wash warm, made in China, at 636 dollars. There are no reviews and no fit votes, so there is no score to quote. This garment is worth including in this group for two reasons, and both of them are comparisons that make something clear. The first is that it explains itself. Its published measurements look severe: a 24 inch bust against a model with a 34 inch bust, and a 20 inch waist against her 23. On a woven cloth those numbers would be nonsense. They are not nonsense here, and the reason is written directly into the composition, because this fabric is 28% elastane, which is an enormous figure and means the cloth has genuine power and genuine compression. We covered another dress from this same brand in the previous group with measurements that looked similarly severe, and we called those a data error, because that garment had no elastane at all and no opening and no pleats. Same brand, same size label, same pull-on construction, and the two verdicts are opposite for one identifiable reason. The second reason is smaller and more useful: this gown has adjustable straps. In the previous entry in this group there is a gown where the single most repeated customer complaint, by a wide margin, is that the straps are too long. This garment has the feature that would have prevented it. The reference is the Porto Tie Lycra Dress by Christopher Esber in Black. Dongguan Bafinasa Garments Co., Ltd. develops comparable jersey gowns on OEM and ODM terms, from fabric sourcing to retail or FBA ready packing. We publish this as a development reference and build your own version of it, and we do not supply the branded original or reproduce anyone else's label.
Key Features
- Lightweight jersey, listed as 72% polyamide, 28% elastane
- 28% elastane, which is what makes the published measurements work
- Pull-on styling with no zip, possible because of the high elastane
- Front cut-out detail as stated
- Adjustable shoulder straps as stated
- Unlined as stated
- Floor length, 58 inches as published
- Hand wash warm as stated
Customisable Options
- Fabric: polyamide elastane jersey as the reference, with the elastane percentage agreed from a tested sample
- Compression: we would agree how firm the garment should hold, since 28% sets that
- Straps: adjustable as the reference, which we would keep and recommend
- Cut-out: front as the reference, and how it is held in place
- Length from midi to floor, size set, colour development, private label and care labelling
Specifications
| Style | Porto tie lycra gown |
| Reference | Christopher Esber, Porto Tie Lycra Dress, style CHRF-WD387, manufacturer style 26027701, colour Black |
| Composition | 72% polyamide, 28% elastane, lightweight jersey as stated |
| Elastane Note | 28% is a very high figure, so the cloth has real power and real compression, which is what makes the measurements below work |
| Closure | Pull-on styling as stated, with no zip, which is viable because of the elastane content |
| Details | Front cut-out as stated, adjustable shoulder straps as stated |
| Lining | Unlined as stated |
| Care | Hand wash warm as stated |
| Sizes Published | Aus 4/US 0, Aus 6/US 2, Aus 8/US 4, Aus 10/US 6, Aus 12/US 8 |
| Measurements Published | Aus 6/US 2: bust 24 in, waist 20 in, hips 29 in, length 58 in |
| Chart Note | Ten inches of negative ease at the bust, made workable by 28% elastane rather than by cut alone |
| Model | 182 cm, wearing size Aus 6/US 2, bust 86 cm, waist 58 cm, hips 91 cm |
| Production | Made in China as stated |
| Reference Retail | 636 USD, quoted to show the price band this sits in, not as our price |
| Customer Reviews | None on the reference listing, so we quote no score |
| Best Seller Badge | None. The listing carries no rank |
| Categories | Filed by the retailer under both gowns and cut-out dresses |
| Occasion | Evenings, events, formal occasions, resort |
| MOQ | 100 pcs per style per colourway, mixed sizes and colourways accepted |
| Sampling | 7-10 days after tech pack or reference sample confirmation |
| Bulk Lead Time | 20-30 days after sample approval and deposit |
| Service | OEM / ODM / private label, stretch jersey sourcing, compression grading, retail or FBA ready packing |
Size Chart
| Size | Bust | Waist | Hips | Length | Source | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| US 2 | 24 | in | 20 | in | 29 | in | 58 | in / | 147 | cm | As published | ||||||
| AUS 4 / US 0 | 31 | in / | 79 | cm | 24 | in / | 61 | cm | 34 | in / | 86 | cm | 145 | cm / | 57.1 | in | Our proposal |
| AUS 6 / US 2 | 33 | in / | 84 | cm | 26 | in / | 66 | cm | 36 | in / | 91 | cm | 147 | cm / | 57.9 | in | Our proposal |
| AUS 8 / US 4 | 35 | in / | 89 | cm | 28 | in / | 71 | cm | 38 | in / | 97 | cm | 149 | cm / | 58.7 | in | Our proposal |
| AUS 10 / US 6 | 37 | in / | 94 | cm | 30 | in / | 76 | cm | 40 | in / | 102 | cm | 151 | cm / | 59.4 | in | Our proposal |
| AUS 12 / US 8 | 39 | in / | 99 | cm | 32 | in / | 81 | cm | 42 | in / | 107 | cm | 153 | cm / | 60.2 | in | Our proposal |
The published size US 2 gives a 24 inch bust, a 20 inch waist and a 29 inch hip against a model at roughly 34, 23 and 36, with a length of 58 inches. Those are negative ease figures, and they are workable here because the cloth is 28% elastane, which has genuine power. Compare this with a dress from the same brand in the previous group, published at 18 inches with no elastane and no opening, which we judged to be a data error. We would publish the worn circumference alongside the flat one so customers are not deterred by the number.
Occasions and Styling
Suits evenings, events, formal occasions and resort. A floor length stretch jersey gown travels well and packs small, which makes it a genuinely good resort and destination event piece, and that is worth saying on the page.
Production and Quality Control
There are no reviews on this listing and no fit votes, so there is no score to quote. There is a measurement here that looks severe and is entirely fine, a comparison with a sibling garment that makes the reason clear, and one small feature we would recommend copying.
A 24 inch bust is the first thing, and it is instructive precisely because it looks wrong and is not. The model measures about 34 inches at the bust, so the published 24 is ten inches under her own, and the waist at 20 against her 23 is three under. On a woven cloth, a garment cut ten inches under the bust could not be got into and that would be the end of the discussion. The reason it works is in the composition: this is 72% polyamide with 28% elastane. That is a very high elastane figure, and at that level the cloth is not merely stretchy, it has power, meaning it stretches under force and pushes back when the force is removed. It is a compression cloth. So the garment opens to go over the body and then holds close to it, and the flat measurement describes the garment at rest rather than the garment worn. We would publish the worn circumference as well as the flat one, because a customer reading 24 inches will conclude it cannot possibly fit her and will not buy it, and that would be a shame on a garment that presumably fits very well.
The comparison with the sibling garment is the second thing, and it is the cleanest controlled comparison we have been able to make in this series. In the previous group we covered another dress from this same brand, in the same size system, with the same pull-on construction, published at a bust and waist of 18 inches. We called that figure impossible and recommended discarding it, and the reasoning was that the garment had no elastane in its composition, no zip or opening, and no pleating, so there was no mechanism on it that would allow a garment to open. Now compare. Same brand, same Aus 6 / US 2 label, same pull-on construction. The difference is that this one is 28% elastane. That single line in the composition is the entire difference between a measurement that describes a real garment and a measurement that cannot. We think this is worth holding onto as a method: when you see a negative ease figure on a listing, do not judge it in isolation. Ask what on the garment permits it to open, and if nothing does, treat the number as suspect.
Adjustable straps is the third thing, and it is the recommendation we would make most strongly from this group. This gown has adjustable shoulder straps. In the entry immediately before this one, there is a gown with 96 fit votes where the single most repeated customer complaint, from customer after customer, is that the straps are too long and need tailoring, with several saying they returned the garment over it and one saying the alterations required were not worth it. Those customers were mostly five foot three and five foot four, and the garment was fitted on a model of five foot ten, which is the whole problem. Adjustable straps solve that at a stroke, because the wearer sets the length herself and the same garment then fits across a range of heights instead of one. It costs a slider and a few centimetres of strap. Set against the alternative, which is that a proportion of your customers pay a tailor or send the dress back, it is one of the cheapest things on a spec sheet and one of the highest returning. We would specify it as standard on anything with a shoulder strap.
Hand wash warm, the front cut-out and the high elastane are the last thing. The care instruction is hand wash warm, which is unusual because most listings say cold, and it is defensible here: polyamide tolerates warm water well and warm water helps a compressed cloth relax back to shape. The caution is that elastane is damaged by heat, so the instruction needs a temperature on it rather than the word warm, because warm means different things to different people and hot will destroy the recovery of this garment faster than anything else you can do to it. On the front cut-out, a cut-out in a stretch jersey is held in shape by the tension of the cloth around it rather than by structure, which means the opening will distort as the wearer moves, and how far it distorts depends on how firm the compression is. That is worth testing in movement, because a cut-out that looks deliberate standing can look stretched seated. We would also decide how firm the hold should be, because at 28% elastane the size a customer chooses determines how compressed she is, which makes the grading more consequential than on a normal garment. Every bulk shipment gets a measurement report against your approved chart.
Optional upgrades include adjustable straps as standard, the elastane percentage and compression level agreed from a tested sample, a care label with an actual temperature on it, published worn circumferences alongside flat ones, a cut-out tested in movement, a defined jersey weight, alternative cut-out placements, alternative strap styles, alternative lengths, extended sizing, colour development and private label, hangtag and care labelling.
Pre-production sample approval, in-line inspection during cutting and sewing, and a final AQL inspection before packing, with measurement reports and photos shared before shipment.
Send us your tech pack, a photo or a reference garment and we will quote within 24 hours. Contact bafinasa@bafinasa.com or WhatsApp +86 13827222469.

